Ongoing violence in Darfur is impacting on civilians

1425

The security situation in Darfur is a serious one, marked by a “deeply concerning” increase in violent attacks by armed assailants against United Nations peacekeepers and humanitarian personnel, the Assistant Secretary-General for UN peacekeeping operations told the Security Council this week.

“Most worrisome is the devastating impact it has had on innocent civilians and the obstacles it has created for their protection and for humanitarian assistance,” Edmond Mulet said, reporting “very limited progress” in the peace process to the Council.

He said the second phase of the Government’s military offensive, Operation Decisive Summer, resulted in high numbers of newly displaced people. At least 78,000 people have been displaced by conflict in Darfur this year, according to humanitarian organisations. In addition, the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) received reports of some 130,000 additional internal displaced persons (IDPs), which it was not yet able to verify.
“Most of these unverified IDPs are said to be in the Jebel Marra area, where the heaviest fighting has been taking place and which is mostly inaccessible for humanitarian partners. There is also significant concern about reports of indiscriminate attacks against civilians, as well as other violations of human rights and international humanitarian law,” the UN official explained.

Additionally inter-communal fighting has led to periodic outbreaks of violence, with conflicts over resources an aggravating factor, as well as broader political tensions and the actions of numerous paramilitary groups and militias, the proliferation of small arms and criminality and the handling of insecurity by local authorities.

Despite the difficult operating environment, including movement restrictions and other obstructions imposed by the belligerent parties, Mulet assured Council members the African Union-UN Operation in Darfur (UNAMID) remained resolute in its commitment to deliver on its strategic priorities.
“The adequate responses by units when attacked and the proactive approach shown when protecting IDPs are indicators of continuous improvement as a result of the change of attitude, robustness and training” requested by the implementation of the strategic review, he stated.

For the Assistant Secretary-General, the most significant achievements of UNAMID over the reporting period were the establishment of “protective areas” and instances in which peacekeepers repelled or prevented attacks against civilians, conducted robust patrols to affected villages and escorted humanitarian missions during intercommunal clashes.
“Protection committees were also formed with IDPs to co-ordinate relevant protection activities in collaboration with humanitarian personnel,” Mulet said.

As for the formulation of an exit strategy for UNAMID, even though an outcome has not been produced yet, the AU/UN team has explored the idea of a “two-pronged approach” with the Sudanese Government.
“First, UNAMID’s proposal is based on the achievement of the Mission’s benchmarks and premised on a political solution to the conflict based on direct talks between the parties, starting with a cessation of hostilities.”

The exit strategy is also based on the gradual and phased withdrawal of UNAMID’s force from West Darfur, where there has not been any major fighting in two years, complemented by a progressive handover of its tasks to the Government and the UN Country Team. Three other team sites in North and South Darfur, in areas that do not necessitate the Mission’s presence, will also be closed.

Acknowledging the prospect of a definitive end to the crisis seemed to be “wishful thinking” in the current environment, the Assistant Secretary-General said the UN Secretariat, in agreement with the Council for Peace and Security of the African Union, has requested from the Security Council the extension of UNAMID’s mandate for an additional year, until June 2016.



According to the Deputy Joint Special Representative for UNAMID, the peace process is stalled and the greatest challenge it meets is the “Sudanese Government’s reluctance” to engage in negotiations with armed movements.