Kagame critic’s mother speaks out

1130

The mother and sister of a prominent critic of Rwanda’s president said all three of them were tortured and deprived of food jailed on charges of forgery and inciting insurrection.

Adeline Rwigara told a court she and her daughters were handcuffed day and night.

She is being held along with her daughter Diane Shima Rwigara, a 35-year-old accountant who tried to stand against President Paul Kagame in August elections.

Diane Rwigara, accused of faking registration papers for the election, was eventually barred from running and Kagame went on to win with 98.8% of the vote.

She has repeatedly accused Kagame of stifling dissent and criticised his Rwandan Patriotic Front’s tight grip on the country since it fought its way to power to end Rwanda’s 1994 genocide.

Kagame denies cracking down on dissent. Justice minister Johnston Busingye declined to comment on the torture allegations, saying they were a matter for the court.

HANDCUFFED
“Since August 29, I and my children were tortured,” Adeline told the panel of three judges.
“We were handcuffed day and night, without eating or drinking,” Adeline said, adding they had once gone without food and medication for a week.

Diane’s younger sister Anne said the family was kept in solitary confinement.
“Imagine staying in a closed room for 24 hours without access to fresh air. At least allow us to bask in the sun for 30 minutes and be visited,” she said.

Diane Rwigara was in court but did not speak.

Their lawyer Buhuru Pierre Celestin told the court their confinement violated international conventions.

In response, prosecutors told the court the defendants’ rights were respected, without commenting on the torture allegations.

Human Rights Watch said the government routinely and unlawfully detained and tortured detainees with beatings, asphyxiations, mock executions and electric shocks.



Asked by Reuters to respond to Rwigara’s torture accusations, Minister of Justice Johnston Busingye said: “Issues raised in court are determined by the court. If there is a claim of torture in court, the court is the proper place to examine it and determine what happened.”