Arms trade treaty at risk?

2090

Anti-arms trade activists say efforts end the irresponsible and poorly-regulated international arms trade are at risk of failure. Negotiations at the United Nations have entered a critical final week, campaigners say.

The talks, which carried on throughout the weekend in New York, are now being dominated by sceptical governments including Iran, Syria and Cuba, intent on having a weak treaty – or no treaty at all, ControlArms said in a statement issued in New York.

South Africa wants a strong treaty that will regulate conventional, small arms and light weapons and ammunitions. But China and Russia are opposed to effective human rights and humanitarian rules in any deal whilst the US wants exclusions that could undermine the effectiveness of any treaty, the campaigners said.
“London and Paris, which until now have been key champions of a strong treaty, are now coming under intense pressure from Washington. There are concerns that they may trade-off strong international humanitarian and human rights protections to get China, Russia and the US to sign up to any final deal.
“Concern is mounting that countries including Australia, France, Japan and the UK are reportedly saying less and less of real substance in the negotiations room – instead focusing their efforts on behind-closed-doors talks with the major players.”

ControlArms says the critical focus during the final days of negotiations will be on the steps governments will be required to take before deciding whether an arms transfer should go ahead or not. “A small minority of governments refuses to agree that a transfer should be prohibited if there is a substantial risk it will be used for violations of human rights or international humanitarian law.”

Last Friday, a statement outlining the minimum humanitarian principles that must be included in the treaty, was supported by 74 states including Colombia, Malawi, Mexico, Norway and New Zealand and scores of Caribbean and African nations. But key players including the UK, Australia, Japan and France did not sign up.
“Over 70 countries, some that have been the most affected by armed violence, have now made it clear that they will not cave in and accept a weak treaty, Anna Macdonald, Head of Arms Control at Oxfam, said. “There is still time for others to speak out and show their commitment for the strongest possible deal. The sceptics have had more than their share of the limelight. With five days of negotiations ahead of us, it’s critical that supporters of the treaty fight to secure a text that will really save lives.”



The potential exclusion of ammunition in the final treaty text is also becoming an issue of mounting concern. Geoff Tunnicliffe, Secretary General of the World Evangelical Alliance, said: “We witness the human cost of unlawful armed violence everyday. This treaty offers the best opportunity in a generation to end the human cost of the irresponsible arms trade. For this to be true, ammunition must be included in any agreement. Guns without bullets are useless.” Many states from Africa, Latin America and the Carribbean also say it is essential that the sale and transfer of ammunition is covered by the new agreement, but several countries including China, Egypt, India and the US are calling for it to be excluded.