Stratfor: Egypt looks to rein in NGOs
Written by defenceWeb, Friday, 10 February 2012
A U.S. State Department spokeswoman said the matter should not be treated as a judicial matter, but rather should be handled as a state-to-state issue, subject to negotiations and without penalties.
The NGO issue reflects the belief of the Egyptian military leaders that last year's unrest was fomented by foreign-funded NGOs and, as was made clear in the charges, that the NGOs have become increasingly active and are continuing to attempt to influence Egyptian politics.
The question of the role of international NGOs is a controversial one. The Russians, for example, charged that NGOs, funded by the CIA, were behind the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004-2005. Others have claimed that international NGOs were operating in their countries to destabilise their governments, frequently as tools of foreign governments trying to achieve political and strategic ends under the guise of promoting democracy or human rights.
The Americans and Europeans regard this as an appropriate mission. They see increasing democracy, strengthening civil society and pressing for human rights as reasonable efforts. The term used for this activity is "soft power," which is when non-military, non-coercive means are used to influence and pressure foreign governments to reform. The use of NGOs toward this end goes back to the Cold War, when human rights groups, sometimes funded by the West, operated in the former Soviet Union, trying to foment change. Part of this mission, it must be added, included attempting to destabilise the Soviet regime.
This is the crux of the problem. The United States and Europe see many of the world's existing governments as repressive and as violating human rights. NGOs, some with government funding but most without, operate in these countries to create pressure to reform. However, the regimes see themselves as the legitimate government of the country, and they see the presence of the NGOs as an attempt to foment unrest and destabilise them. In a sense, NGOs and the Egyptian government view NGOs the same way, as effective in fomenting change. The difference is that the NGOs like what they are doing and the Egyptian government doesn't.
From the viewpoint of the Egyptian government, the NGOs have been successful in Egypt, and therefore the government intends to shut them down. Ultimately, Egypt's leaders see the efforts of the NGOs as interference by foreign nationals in the country's internal affairs.
All of this intersects with geopolitics in the sense that the more effective NGOs are, the more useful they are as a tool to shape the internal affairs of a country. The question is the extent to which they represent the will of their national governments. Therefore, how the NGOs are funded becomes crucial. But in the end, however they are funded, they represent a threat to existing governments.
In fact, the Egyptian government is clearly prepared to jeopardise its relationship with the United States and forfeit U.S. aid if that's what it takes to control the NGOs. Of course, there is a political dimension, with the ruling Egyptian officials using the charges against the NGOs to portray themselves as nationalists resisting Western forces. At the same time, the case acknowledges that NGOs are an effective force.
It follows from this that other countries are watching Egypt's actions carefully. This case could set a precedent for other governments that want to shut down Western NGOs in their country. If that happened, it would obviously affect the NGOs, but it would also affect a significant dimension of Western soft power. How far this spreads beyond Egypt will be important to watch.
“Egypt looks to rein in NGOs” republished with the permission of Stratfor, www.stratfor.com
Top stories this week
- Egyptian court sentences Mursi to 20 years in prison
- DCNS starts construction on first Egyptian Gowind corvette
- Bomb kills soldier, wounds another in Egypt's Sinai
- Bomb in north Egypt kills 2 military academy students
- New U.N. site for flights in conflict zones issues warnings on Libya, Egypt
- Egypt and Saudi Arabia discuss manoeuvres as Yemen battles rage
- Militant bomb attack in Egypt's North Sinai kills 6 soldiers
- Egypt imposes life jail penalty for cross-border tunnel use
- Egypt sentences Muslim Brotherhood leader, others to death
- US approves Hellfire sale to Egypt
Nautic Africa acquires Anchor Boat Shop
by Nautic Africa, 24 April 2015
Established nearly 80 years ago, the boat producer holds the exclusive rights for Yamaha engine sales in Africa.
Saab receives order on Ceros 200 from Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization
by Saab, 17 April 2015
The Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization will buy the tracking system for approximately SEK 145 million.
More than just IFE - Thales expands its offer into InFlyt Experience
by Thales, 17 April 2015
Thales will reshape its in-flight entertainment and connectivity activities into Thales InFlyt Experience.
Nautic Africa service portfolio expanded to include quayside facility management services
by Nautic Africa, 17 April 2015
The maritime company has added quayside facility management to its portfolio, commencing with management of the Hamlet Quay.
Denel brings strong offerings in missiles, turrets, aviation technology
by Denel Corporate, 16 April 2015
Attendees to the international defence and security expo can review progress on the development of the A-Darter air-to-air missile from Denel.
Saab, Embraer establish partnership for joint programme management for Brazil's F-X2 Project
by Saab, 16 April 2015
The companies will collaborate on a joint programme management service for Brazil's F-X2 Project.